Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Towards developing scalable climate-smart village models approach and lessons learnt from pilot research in West Africa

By: Bayala J | Zougmoré R | Ky-Dembele C | Bationo A B | Buah S | Sanogo D | Somda J | Tougiani A | Traoré K | Kalinganire A.
Series: no. 25 ICRAF Occasional Paper. 2016Description: 42p.Subject(s): participatory action | climate-smart agriculture | Climate change | Farming systems | Climate variability | Food security | Mitigation | West and Central AfricaOnline resources: Download PDF Science in progress - D1Summary: This occasional paper presents a report from a project on “Developing community-based climate smart agriculture through participatory action research in CCAFS benchmark sites in West Africa” which is a joint initiative of CCAFS-West Africa programme and ICRAF-WCA. Other key players of the project are the national research institutes namely Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA, Burkina Faso),Savanna Agriculture Research Institute of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR-SARI, Ghana), Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER, Mali), Institut Senegalais de Recherche Agricole (ISRA) and Institut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN). After three years of implementation, the present document is describing the approach used and the lessons learnt. The project used participatory action research approach to test combinations of innovations to address the triple goal of climate smart agriculture which are adaptation to climate change, mitigation of the effects of climate change and attaining food security. Results showed that despite differences in relation to the local contexts of the five CCAFS pilot sites in West Africa, the actions have been guided by a number of common elements. The first of the commonalities was building a strong partnership to develop agricultural systems that improve the resilience of ecosystems and people. The second element aimed to strengthening the capacity of key stakeholders (farmers, students and development agents) through vocational and academic trainings. The third targets awareness raising and information dissemination while the fourth involved identifying and testing, in a participatory way, the best fit agricultural practices addressing climate change issues both at plot, community and landscape levels. Finally, assessing the impact of the project activities on the biophysical and social changes was common to all national teams’ project of activities. The field activities of the project included weather forecast information sharing, a combination of integrated soil fertility management, soil and water conservation, vegetation rehabilitation, droughttolerant crop varieties testing and diversification, as well as the analysis of the change in behaviour of all actors involved in the activities and capacity strengthening. The local communities were more receptive of project interventions that involved individual actions as opposed to the collective ones.This observation led to more focus on individual activities by the national teams while reinforcing those of social capital-building as collective actions are also needed to address climate change issues at community and landscape levels. Training and awareness-raising activities are critical for this last aspect. An evaluation of the project through two consultants appointed by ICRAF reported that the project was well designed and was very relevant in the context of climate change as its objectives are in line with local needs especially national research/ development goals. From their assessment, the most promising and sustainable outputs were found to be the individual, low cost and locallygrounded technologies/innovations. In addition, farmers demanded soil and water conservation techniques (e.g., Zaï), agroforestry practices (e.g.,Farmer-managed Natural Regeneration, fodder banks and fruit tree planting) and crop diversification (leafy vegetables). The main weaknesses of the project according to the consultants include lack of systematic baseline and actions about assessing greenhouse gas as indicated in the project document. Based on these weaknesses and achievements, recommendations for future actions have been formulated to be used to adjust the activities, particularly for the second phase.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Open Access

This occasional paper presents a report from a project on “Developing community-based climate smart agriculture through participatory action research in CCAFS benchmark sites in West
Africa” which is a joint initiative of CCAFS-West Africa programme and ICRAF-WCA. Other key players of the project are the national research institutes namely Institut de l’Environnement et
de Recherches Agricoles (INERA, Burkina Faso),Savanna Agriculture Research Institute of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR-SARI, Ghana), Institut d’Economie Rurale
(IER, Mali), Institut Senegalais de Recherche Agricole (ISRA) and Institut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN). After three years of implementation, the present document is describing
the approach used and the lessons learnt. The project used participatory action research approach to test combinations of innovations to address the triple goal of climate smart agriculture which
are adaptation to climate change, mitigation of the effects of climate change and attaining food security. Results showed that despite differences in relation to the local contexts of the five CCAFS pilot
sites in West Africa, the actions have been guided by a number of common elements. The first of the commonalities was building a strong partnership to develop agricultural systems that improve the
resilience of ecosystems and people. The second element aimed to strengthening the capacity of key stakeholders (farmers, students and development agents) through vocational and academic trainings.
The third targets awareness raising and information dissemination while the fourth involved identifying and testing, in a participatory way, the best fit agricultural practices addressing climate change
issues both at plot, community and landscape levels. Finally, assessing the impact of the project activities on the biophysical and social changes was common to all national teams’ project of activities.
The field activities of the project included weather forecast information sharing, a combination of integrated soil fertility management, soil and water conservation, vegetation rehabilitation, droughttolerant
crop varieties testing and diversification, as well as the analysis of the change in behaviour of all actors involved in the activities and capacity strengthening. The local communities were more receptive of project interventions that involved
individual actions as opposed to the collective ones.This observation led to more focus on individual activities by the national teams while reinforcing those of social capital-building as collective actions
are also needed to address climate change issues at community and landscape levels. Training and awareness-raising activities are critical for this last aspect. An evaluation of the project through two
consultants appointed by ICRAF reported that the project was well designed and was very relevant in the context of climate change as its objectives are in line with local needs especially national research/
development goals. From their assessment, the most promising and sustainable outputs were found to be the individual, low cost and locallygrounded technologies/innovations. In addition, farmers demanded soil and water conservation
techniques (e.g., Zaï), agroforestry practices (e.g.,Farmer-managed Natural Regeneration, fodder banks and fruit tree planting) and crop diversification (leafy vegetables). The main weaknesses of the
project according to the consultants include lack of systematic baseline and actions about assessing greenhouse gas as indicated in the project document. Based on these weaknesses and
achievements, recommendations for future actions have been formulated to be used to adjust the activities, particularly for the second phase.

West and Central Africa

CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)

CGIAR Fund Donors

The Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)

Australian Government (ACIAR)

Irish Aid

Environment Canada

Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Netherlands

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)

Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (IICT)

UK Aid

Government of Russia

The European Union (EU)

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade

2016051

Science in progress - D1

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

//]]>